Summary

Anmol Sethi

Summary

            In the article “ Vampire gentlemen and zombie beasts”, Angela Tenga and Elizabeth Zimmerman explore the concrete differences between vampires and zombies. Initially, Tenga and Zimmerman discuss the evolution of vampires and zombies. Vampires have transitioned from disobeying society’s “norms” to an understanding of laws and motivation to obey them. Whereas zombies have always represented the darkest part of human nature and depict what we will all become one day-out of control and decomposed flesh.

            The authors continue the comparison on a physical level. Vampires portray youth, beauty and vitality, which promotes eternal beauty. The sudden emphasis on external beauty has caused an increase in interest for cosmetic surgery in order to become “thinner or prettier”. On the contrary, zombies remind us of physical decay and deterioration. Zombies show us how easily our bodies can become invaded and that physical beauty is only temporary.

            Not only do the authors compare vampires and zombies on a micro level but also on a macro level, stating their societies differences economically. Tenga and Zimmerman argue that vampires promote capitalism with their lavish lifestyles and exquisite tastes. This can be seen in “Twilight” as the Cullens live largely and experience rewards without work. Zombies, however, are believed to be a collective group that acts without thought or willpower. Individuality is highly valued by vampires whereas zombies dismantle the concept completely. Zombies reveal the reality of corruption and greed. These creatures are unable to maintain boundaries, both literal and figurative. Vampires are able to respect boundaries. As seen in “Twilight” the Cullens respect the treaty with the Quileutes by not crossing that area of land. Vampires also respect the figurative boundary, skin, by feeding on other animals besides humans.

            The overall purpose of this article was to differentiate between vampires and zombies on multiple levels. The authors explained that the idea of a “monster” is constantly changing and is perceived differently by individuals.